Filed under: CW Lab Notes, office development, roof | Tags: personal architecture, portable housing booths
security booths, ticket booths, toll booths, fork-liftable booths, gaurd towers! 



caroline woolard to Natalie


Filed under: CW Lab Notes, Ownership Structures, office development, roof | Tags: housing, mfa, Ownership Structures, residency
Q: Why are residencies appealing when they perpetuate a white-cube approach to site and context? A: The residence itself! In NYC, more than half of my income goes to housing and commuter transportation (I make $1,350 a month. I spend $675 on housing and $80 on a subway pass or bike fixes and occasional taxi rides). Many residencies provide little equipment and fly in artists from urban areas for “focused” attention. This model is familiar and therefore, more easily funded. I propose: a residency in anyone’s urban home, office, or studio! Take the money used to buy land/build studios/house artists, and use existing structures (offices, apts) in NY so you can spend the money on a project or artist’s fees. Use it as a tax write off! Find a way for individuals to affiliate with the artists-in-my-residence project or the artists-not-in-residence (a.k.a. keep-the-artist-in-my-city) support project.
Or to simply deal with the housing issue… Stop the boring and traditional industrial gentrification (artists exploited for cultural capital) and find alternative lifestyles in re-imagined urban life. House in a parking lot! House in a graveyard! House on a roof! House in a fire escape. Why can’t we have long term artistic communities in urban environments? How will I ever get to know or trust or age with my neighbors? Will my neighborhood even be distinguishable from the next? Is NY becoming the suburb we fled from? Why won’t the city and the housing department approach artists systems with the same flexibility as the netherlands or germany? And why not allow art projects as “temporary” as the temporary structures of municipal construction?
Q: Why pay for an MFA at grad school? A: Don’t! Simply formalize the conceptual art vocation enough to guarantee standards of quality and legitimacy. For example, classical musicians are certified by a single mentor’s trust to enter the profession and architect’s apprenticeships have a currency towards licensing and public trust. In new programs like the MFA program at Vermont College, students select mentors for an accredited system, allowing “students to incorporate life experience and previous education into self-designed studies.”
Natalie says: read Sexton
Filed under: CW Lab Notes, good work, office development, roof | Tags: andreas strauss, austria, das park hotel, industrial architecutre, re-use
rethinking utilities: large concrete drain pipes as a hotel… reserve a room
![]()
![]()
Filed under: Structures of Participation, Texts, roof | Tags: alternative space, architecture, enough room for space, martin hendrijks
Martin Hendrijks show called Enough Room for Space about
“Displacement of residents, whether they are gentrifying artists priced out of Soho or the poor and unemployed excluded from New York altogether, is no random by-product of gentrification but its structural condition. Decay, disinvestment, abandonment . . .prepare the way for profitable reinvestment . . . Like all the social relations that art supposedly transcends, housing is one of the historical circumstances of its existence”. Rosalyn Deutsche, “Alternative Space”
“And howsoever oppositional we architects may be, as long as we fail to challenge basic elements of society, such as the concept of private property, nothing will improve. This is a great paradox for me”. Achim Felz, “IKAS: An Experiment in Extra-Parliamentary Architectural Opposition”
incognito roof skylight research
I am researching air rights, roof design, and building code issues related to my rooftop aspirations with skylines of horizonal inspiration.